Chicken fat and glucose control
My aunt myrtle uses an ancient healing test and art to control my after
meal glucose. She goes to a local factory farm and gets chicken fat. She
uses this drug and insecticide and hormone saturated fat because the
secrete of the process is that similar attract similar.
By rendering the fat to get the right balance she has me put my left hand
ut to the wrist into the warm chicken fat just before eating. Because
similar attract similar all the toxins are drawn from my body and the
energy flows are balanced again in my body.
She tests my glucose by seeing what color the fat turns after this
treatment. Without fail, after eating a meal with carbs my glucose returns
to near normal levels by two hours. If the color test is off she has me
leave my hand in for a longer or shorter time to get the right effect.
I swear by the treatment and all my friends agree. I don’t care what
traditional medicine and science says, it works for me and I’m sticking to
it because it works.
Bty, its good for headaches and colds and many other things too by removing
the toxins and balancing the energy fields, the secret is knowing where to
put the chicken fat for these other things.
XB
IC|XC
January 17th, 2004 at 8:59 pm
Dear
XB
IC|XC,
Although the attempt is ridicule, I respond gently that if this were a serious
attempt to provide care and it worked for you that I would not knock it nor
ridicule it.
It would be nice to see a like response from you sometime.
I would share with you the following:
The Copenhagen model that Heissenburg supported and that has since proven
accurate has, at its very core, the concept that all observation is subjective
because all observation modifies the thing observed. The classic two-slit
photon experiment proves this. Hence, physics would indicate that the
experience of the individual and the observation of the individual of the event
changes it, even though we believe that what we are seeing is "pure science."
The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics clearly illustrates the
subjectivity of observation. You can know the position of a particle or the
momentum of a particle, but you cannot know both. The more you know of one, the
less certain you are of the other. It is true in the macrocosm as well, it is
just not as obvious.
Ridicule of another’s positon when one has previously been a science fundy
oneself tends to create the enigma of Schrodinger’s cat - is it dead or alive
after the release of the poison. Perhaps you’d like to enter the box and find
out? Me, I’d rather postulate.
Gently, gently, I ask you to realize that there is more than one way to
interpret the observable universe and that science fundamenalism can be just as
flawed as any other fundamentalism.
As to your Auntie, always honor your ancestors for they transmit their wisdom to
you and make the rough places straight before you. If not for them, we would
not be here, and if you created her just to ridicule her, then that is a
sadness, indeed.
Cheers!
Marsha
January 18th, 2004 at 5:35 am
Okay.
Marsha